tungwaiyip.info

home

about me

links

Media

Yucatán Photos

St Lucia Photos

Photo Album

Videos

Blog

< March 2006 >
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
    1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

past articles »

Click for San Francisco, California Forecast

San Francisco, USA

 

Book Review: The Tipping Point

The Tipping Point
by Malcolm Gladwell

How does fashion trends emerge, opinions and behaviors change across society? Gladwell suggests it is analogous to epidemics. Small change spread from person to person, until it reaches a tipping point and all of a sudden ends up with big effect.

This book is wildly popular. It is also highly overrated.

It starts off with a lot of excitement. His theory hold a lot of promises and his stories are captivating. But beneath the exuberance my critical mind started to ask, "can this be true?" Further reading failed to bring forward any strong evidence. Instead the same theme grows increasing tired and the stories get more far fetched. Until it got to some absurd idea like the 'rule of 150'. Which basically says the most effective human group size is around 150, a magic number hardwired in our brain during the evolution process. It would be hard pressed to find any empirical evidence to support this. Astute reader might even notice this actually contradict with the Connectors chapter, where his studies shown the number of connects among any group of people varies greatly from very low to very high. All the same he devoted an entire chapter to this 'discovery' and went about this as enthusiastically as anything else.

Our human society is complex. It is often impossible to attribute any event to a simple cause. So when he reduce complex social phenomenon into a single cause, a lot must be missing from his interpretation. Just what does he say about the dramatic drop of crimes rate in New York subway? "Clean up the graffiti and all of a sudden people who would otherwise commit crimes suddenly don't" Magic solution? Or hasty conclusion?

Gladwell's talent is really in writing and journalism rather than sociology and science. There is a lot of excitement, big surprises, big discoveries, big theories but ultimately with weak scientific basis. Sounds familiar? This is sociology done in the style of popular psychology.

2006.03.01 [, ] - comments

 

 

blog comments powered by Disqus

past articles »

 

BBC News

 

France votes for new president amid high security (23 Apr 2017)

 

Mazar-e Sharif attack: Afghanistan mourns deadly Taliban assault (22 Apr 2017)

 

North Korea 'detains American citizen' (23 Apr 2017)

 

Happy Days actress Erin Moran dies at 56 (23 Apr 2017)

 

Kuki Gallmann shot and wounded at Kenya conservation park (23 Apr 2017)

 

General election 2017: UKIP manifesto to pledge a burka ban (23 Apr 2017)

 

Thousands turn out for Washington March for Science (23 Apr 2017)

 

Saudi Arabia's King Salman reverses public sector pay cuts (23 Apr 2017)

 

American Airlines suspends employee after clash over pram (22 Apr 2017)

 

Chelsea beat Spurs to reach FA Cup final (22 Apr 2017)

more »

 

SF Gate

 

Bay Area News (7 Jan 2012)

 

City Insider (11 Feb 2012)

 

Crime Scene (13 Feb 2012)

 

C.W Newius Column (10 Jan 2012)

 

C.W. Nevius Blog (11 Feb 2012)

 

Education News (10 Jan 2012)

 

KALW (11 Feb 2012)

 

Matier and Ross Blog (11 Feb 2012)

 

Our favorite smart thermostats (22 Apr 2017)

 

ICYMI: Ikea’s meatballs; NFL on 4/20; e-sports; Wiz Khalifa’s app (22 Apr 2017)

 

Hotels make battle plans as Airbnb poses threat (22 Apr 2017)

 

CalPERS, CalSTRS to vote against some Wells Fargo directors (22 Apr 2017)

 

Rural electric drivers face ‘range anxiety’ (21 Apr 2017)

 

Wells Fargo increases settlement to million (21 Apr 2017)

more »

 


Site feed Updated: 2017-Apr-23 03:00